The
Contract Institute of Indian Language was set up on the 17th July 1969 with a
view to assisting and co-ordinating the development of Indian languages. The Institute
was charged with the responsibility of serving as a nucleus to bring together
all the research and literary output from various linguistic streams to a common
head and narrowing the gap between basic research and development research in
the fields of languages and linguistics in India.
The Institute and its five Regional Language Centres are thus engaged in research
and teaching which leads to the publication of a wide-ranging variety of materials.
Materials designed for teaching/learning at different levels and suited to specific
needs is one of the major areas of interest in its series of publications. Basic
research relating to the acquisition of language and study of language in its
manifold psychosocial relations constitute another broad range of its interest.
These materials will include materials produced by the members of the staff of
the Central Institute of Indian languages and its Regional Languages Centres and
associated scholars from universities and institutions both Indian and foreign.
Testing and evaluation is one of the neglected fields of study in India. When
it comes to language testing and evaluation of linguistic performances, the picture
is more bleak. Testing language competence is a difficult task, particularly in
the absence of relevant research in the areas of language acquisition by children
and adults, by first generation learners and those coming from educated homes,
under monolingual and multilingual conditions. Dakin (1971) speaks of 'no reliable
objectives means' for assessing language competence, while Clark (1973) and Palermo
(1974) point out the difficulty in sorting out linguistic and extra linguistic
strategies in communication.dialogue is difficult to determine in the absence
of information on all the variables.
In short, whether it is testing and evaluation of the programme, the process or
the product or it is of the skill, content and performance it is a complex phenomenon.
If this monograph brings out some of this complexity, them its publication would
be deemed to be worthwhile. Dr. K. V. V. L. Narasimharao deserves congratulations
on the preparation of the manuscript expeditiously. All the other colleagues who
have helped in seeing the book through the light of the day deserve all thanks.