Development
of languages may be natural or planned. Development is planned to quicken the
phase and to guide the direction. The planning is generally visualised at the
governmental level. But there is also another force which influences the development
of language; it is individuals and groups who can generate a momentum around a
linguistic cause among the users of the language. This momentum takes the shape
of a movement with varying degrees of cohension and sustenance. The movements
bring about change by forcing the government to pursue a particular policy or
by winning the people to a particular point of view. The papers collected in this
book describe such movements in Indian languages.
There
are various aspects of language about which the people bare concerned. It may
be about the choice of a language or a dialect for wider use, about preservation
of purity, about the choice of a script or reform of script or spelling, about
maintenance, about political and territorial unification etc. The papers describe
these concerns in relation to one or two Indian languages. Similar concerns may
be found in other languages also and these papers provide a point of reference
for comparison.
Though
all have been called movments, some are more organised than others. But they are
not tightly organised to the extend of being the programmes of a political party
nor is so unstructured to be called mob action. They also differ in the degree
to which the language is involved in the issue. The choice of a standard dialect,
for example,
is more a linguistic matter than the demand for a linguistic state. But even in
the latter, language is the rallying point. This paper, appropriately, is by a
political scientist, while others are by linguists.
There
is one recurring point in all the papers. The languge movemnts are expressions
of changing socio-economic and cultured conditions. They are manifested through
the issues of language, since language is a very transparent cultural symbol.
Another point is that these movemnts originate with elites. This raises an important
question about the social nature of language problems. Sociolinguits must concern
themselves with such questions.
The
movements described in the papers belong to this century, but some of these had
their origin in the last century itself. These two centuries brought about significant
socio-economic and cultural changes in the country and hence many language movements.
The
papers were originally presented in a Seminar on Language Movemnets of this Century
in India organized by the Institute on the 31st December 1976 and the 1st January
1977. Besides the ten written papers included in the book, Prof. Ashok R. Kelkar
gave an oral presentation on Movement for Script and Spelling Reform: Marathi.
Dr.K.l.Gandhi's paper was made the Seminar rewarding by their papers, presence
and participation and to Dr. D.P.Pattanayak who made the possible. I express my
thanks to the staff of the Institute, who made the New year eve not only academically
stimulating but also socially congenial.
E. ANNAMALAI